Groover.co: Honest Review
Groover.co Review: Real Feedback or Just Another Promo Platform?
Services like Groover.co promise to bridge that gap — giving artists direct access to playlist curators, radio stations, journalists, and industry professionals, with guaranteed feedback in exchange for a fee.
But how well does it work? Let’s break down the good, the bad, and why PlaylistHub may still be the stronger option for artists looking for lasting results.
What Groover.co Is
Groover.co is a French-based music promotion platform where artists pay credits to send their tracks directly to music curators. Unlike many promotion companies that just pitch songs to playlists behind the scenes, Groover makes curators respond. That means, whether they accept your track or not, you’ll at least get written feedback.
✅ The Good
- Guaranteed Feedback
Every submission requires the curator to listen and give feedback. Even if you don’t get added to their playlist or blog, you learn something — which is more than many promo services can say. - Wide Range of Curators
Groover boasts over 2,000 curators (playlists, blogs, labels, journalists, radio, etc.) covering a wide variety of genres. - Transparent Process
Unlike shady playlisting services, Groover lets you choose who you’re submitting to. You see their profile, reach, and style before you send your track. - Good for Networking
Some artists say Groover is more about building connections than racking up streams. If you’re after exposure in blogs, reviews, or label attention, it’s a decent option.
❌ The Bad
- High Cost per Submission
Each submission costs 2 Grooviz (about €2), and results vary. If you want to submit to 50 curators, that’s already €100 — and you might still end up with only a handful of placements. - Feedback Quality Varies
Some curators write thoughtful comments. Others give generic, cookie-cutter feedback like “good track but not a fit.” That can be frustrating if you’re paying for every response. - Streams Are Not the Focus
If your main goal is Spotify streams or building monthly listeners, Groover isn’t the most efficient route. Many placements are blogs, small radios, or micro-playlists that don’t move the needle. - No Guarantees of Placement
Unlike services that focus on playlist placement, Groover only guarantees feedback. Placements are still a hit-or-miss game.
🎥 YouTube Review
Here’s a solid walkthrough of how Groover works from a user perspective
Groover vs PlaylistHub
Here’s why PlaylistHub might be the better option if you’re focused on building sustainable growth as an artist:
| Feature | Groover.co | PlaylistHub |
|---|---|---|
| Guaranteed Outcome | Guaranteed feedback only | Guaranteed playlist submission + AI-generated review |
| Focus | Networking + feedback | Streams + real playlist placements |
| Cost | ~€2 per curator submission | Credit-based model with higher ROI per stream |
| Best For | Artists seeking reviews, blogs, and industry connections | Artists seeking listener growth, streams, and algorithmic momentum |
| Analytics | Limited insight into actual streams | Placement dashboard + AI curation feedback |
Verdict:
Groover is a great tool if you want feedback, press, or label eyes on your music. But if your main goal is to grow your Spotify streams and monthly listeners, PlaylistHub offers a more efficient and results-oriented system.
Final Thoughts
Groover.co is a respectable platform with a unique focus on feedback and connections. For artists seeking press coverage or industry networking, it can be useful. But if your priority is real playlist placements, higher streams, and long-term growth on Spotify, you’ll likely get better results with PlaylistHub.
👉 Start your next campaign with PlaylistHub.io and grow your audience with smarter playlist promotion.
